How was the rule of the weak and corrupt rulers different than the rule of Constantine? Provide at least two examples.

Explanation:

Rule of constantine makes a difference from the rule of the weak.

The weak wanted everything, they tried to rule an empire while Constantine only started with a small proportion which is the west.

Constantine brought justice for the persecuted Christians creating an empire for them the weak rulers where always persecuting the Christians amongst them.

The weak rule embezzled money for themselves and not for the development and growth it was meant for while Constantine invested the money in building more capitals and constructed churches. He moved away from bribery as the weak does he never bribed the army rather he led the war.