History, 27.05.2020 23:58 sammielucero
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 19:50, kinglightskin2k
Which of these statements best describes the court's ruling in new jersey v tlo? students are not protected under the fourth amendment. students are protected from unreasonable search and seizure, the fourth amendment was found to be unreasonable, every time a student is searched, a police officer must be present.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, athenajames1221
The event shown in the map is a cause of which of the following? *pic*gadsden purchase battle of the alamo bear flag revolt settlement of texas
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 10:00, whiplash40
Which european nation had the most dominant navy during world war i
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Questions in other subjects:
Engineering, 30.05.2020 05:58
English, 30.05.2020 05:58
Mathematics, 30.05.2020 05:58
Medicine, 30.05.2020 05:58
