Hitler focused on the Rhineland and the sundentenland and primarily because

Pan-Germanism and revanchism

Explanation:

Hitler and the Nazi party's main goal was the creation of a Greater Germanic Reich, Which would encompass Germany proper, Denmark, Netherlands,Belgium,the Czech half of Czechoslovakia, Austria, Alsace-Lorraine, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Poland and all of Russian Europe up to the Urals were also to become part of this Super-state Encompassing the continent through a period of resettlement and colonization. The militarization of the Rhineland, the Anchluss of Austria, and the annexation of the Sudetenland was but the first step to achieving Hitler's vision. Hope it helps!

answer; a farmer who refuses to fight in his country's army;

board of education v. earls, 536 u.s. 822 (2002), was a united states supreme court case in which the court upheld the constitutionality of mandatory drug testing by public schools of students participating in extracurricular activities. the legal challenge to the practice was brought by two students, lindsay earls and daniel james, and their families against the school board of tecumseh, oklahoma, alleging that their policy requiring students to consent to random urinalysis testing for drug use violated the fourth amendment to the united states constitution.

the student activities drug testing policy adopted by the tecumseh, oklahoma school district requires all middle and high school students to consent to urinalysis testing for drugs in order to participate in any extracurricular activity. two tecumseh high school students and their parents brought suit, alleging that the policy violates the fourth amendment. the district court granted the school district summary judgment. in reversing, the court of appeals held that the policy violated the fourth amendment. the appellate court concluded that before imposing a suspicionless drug-testing program a school should demonstrate some identifiable drug abuse problem among a sufficient number of those tested, such that testing that group will actually redress its drug problem, which the school district failed to demonstrate.

in a majority opinion delivered by justice clarence thomas, the court held that students in extracurricular activities had a diminished expectation of privacy, and that the policy furthered an important interest of the school in preventing drug use among students. this rationale was based on the precedent vernonia school district 47j v. acton (1995), which allowed drug testing for athletes. justice stephen breyer filed an opinion concurring in the court's judgment.