Why is the prime minister of India considered to be the true leader of India, while the president of India is

considered to be the ceremonial head of state?

Because while the president of India is formally the head of state, and the commander of the armed forces, the president does not have any actual power, and his role is ceremonial.

Explanation:

It is the prime minister of India who has real power, and who actually commands the armed forces, and governs the country.

This is why India has what is known as a parliamentary system: the head of government, who has executive power, is the prime minister, who comes from the party with the largest amount of seats in the parliament.

This system is inherited from Britain, where it was first developed. In fact, the president of India is the equivalent to the Queen of Britian. They are heads of state, but they do not hold any real power.

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation:

health and medicine because people are dying from not being healthy or not strong enough medicine