subject
History, 19.05.2020 21:59 kcwolford03

Based on the Schenck v. United States case, when might it be acceptable for the government to restrict information released by the press? The government can never restrict information released by the press. The government can only restrict information when it could be harmful to an individual’s reputation. The government can only restrict information released when practicing prior restraint. The government can only restrict information that could present an immediate threat to security or the public.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 21:30, user434568
The decision to annex hawaii was a controversial one
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, demahjanaytinsley
What refers to the division of power among the three branches of government
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:10, kendall984
Which of the following would be the most immediate effect of sanctions on a country?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, hdhdenjdxk
What is the significance of the battle of saratoga? a. the defeat at saratoga allowed the british to invade new england by land. b. after the defeat at saratoga france refuse to sign a treaty with the united states. c. the british won a decisive victory at saratoga. d. after the victory at saratoga france gave open support to the united states including arms money and ships.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Based on the Schenck v. United States case, when might it be acceptable for the government to restri...

Questions in other subjects: