History, 07.05.2020 02:08 emmahuber980

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.
Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.
People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.
Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 22.06.2019 00:00, que81hhh

Why were adams ideas not out into action

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:00, pookie879

What was significant about the election of 1828 a. it was first to include b. it was first under new voting reforms c. it reintroduced the two party system d. it was decided by members of congress

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:00, krizzle168

Why do you think alexander hamilton wanted to pay back the bonds from the confederation government

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 08:00, kenna162

Which of the following are characteristics of effective government leaders? select all that apply : has accumulated enough wealth to operate the government : willingness to accept responsibility : keep a government strong and active : has be a successful in the entertainment field : act as a final point of authority

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

Evidence obt...