What are the positive and negative effects of sending in troops as a response to difficulties

My response

Explanation:

Pros:

Troops are effictive in minimizing the threat of angry protesters, pemobs etc, through tactics such as blocking/holding back crowds, etc

They are often used in the events of a crisis, such as a war or natural disaster to aid with medical care, food distrubution, and other services

Cons:

Especially in oppressive regimes, troops might abuse their rights and use their influence to coerce innocent people to give them money, etc. They might also cause outrage by taking actions such as beating up, teargassing, killing, or mass arresting protesters

Troops may use their power to attempt coups, throwing off the stability of a countries govt.

Sorry for the spelling errors,

Jade

because it’s really sad that’s why it’s in history native americans getting kicked out of their homeland.

0. how did the annual sum of their wages compare with the cost of tallow candles at potosí? tallow candles were 300,000 so for huancavelica it takes 3,000 years and for chaplains it took 350 years.11. compare the wages of the mita workers at potosí with the wages paid those amerindians (native americans) who freely hired themselves out? the amerindians made 3 to 4 times more than the mita workers.12. what do you conclude about these figures (6 – 9)? 2