subject
History, 09.04.2020 21:58 xeno777

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students.
Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the
Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands
to school?
A. The school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols.
O
B. The armbands were shown to cause disruption that interfered with
learning.
C. The use of judicial review shows flaws in the majority opinion.
D. Other court cases upheld the rights of schools to limit freedom of
expression

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, marleenlove3
Which of the choices below best describes columbus initial interaction with taino people
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, carlybeavers50
Was sharecropping a good way to survive
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:00, taylorray0820
Which statement best describes the attitude of the radical republicans following the civil war
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:00, lolav3907
After studying the timeline above, what observations can you make about u. s. environmental policy between 1970 and 1996?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 31.08.2020 17:01
Konu
Mathematics, 31.08.2020 17:01