Complete the flowchart to show the development and effects of violence against African Americans in the South

Many organizations in the Reconstruction Era have sought to restore racial order since before the war.

Explanation:

Most historians agree that the racial violence of Caucasians against African Americans was not organized at a higher level or had severe political support. The violence perpetrated by individuals and groups was local. The goal was to restore the earlier racial order to use African Americans as a workforce. This domestic violence was not just against African-Americans, but these local cases also sometimes happened to whites who were declared traitors racially.

Also, groups such as the Ku Klux Klan were primarily aimed at preventing African Americans from engaging in politics or possibly voting. The consequences of racial segregation and its effects will, unfortunately, remain deeply rooted in American society long after this period. Racial segregation and discrimination will continue to be evident for decades after the reconstruction era.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

the federal constitution of the united mexican states of 1824 was enacted on october 4 of 1824, after the overthrow of the mexican empire of agustin de iturbide. in the new constitution, the republic took the name of of united mexican states. it was replaced by the federal constitution of the united mexican states in 1857.