Some historians have argued that the development of the policy of containment after the Second World War marked a turning point in United States foreign policy. Support, modify, or refute this contention using specific evidence.

-adopted policy to halt the expansion of communist influence
-after WWII, U. S. obtained a role as a global leader
-created by George Kennan
-primary U. S. foreign policy from Truman Doctrine (1947) to fall of Berlin Wall (1989)
-involvement in Vietnam grew out of commitments and assumptions of containment
-Effects of containment
~As a global leader, U. S. abandons former policy of isolationism
~involvement in many more foreign entanglements (i. e. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq.

I support this idea.

Explanation:

Arguments in favor:

- -After WWII, U.S. obtained a role as a global leader and abandons isolationism.

-  It  adopted policy to halt the expansion of communist influence that was developed and framed by George Kennan, a US diplomat serving in Moscow.

- involvement in Korea and Vietnam grew out of commitments and assumptions of containment; the US got involved to stop the spread of communism.

- -Containment was the U.S. doctrine of the Cold War, the primary U.S. foreign policy from Truman Doctrine (1947) to fall of Berlin Wall (1989).

based on this information, i would advocate against sweatshop labour because it exploits workers in unsafe working conditions with little pay. though sweatshops produce inexpensive goods, they harm the environment, workers, and often use unsafe materials to make consumer goods.

is that it?

explanation: