History, 24.03.2020 06:29 mia2286

. What argument could be made for the assertion
that the fundamental historical shift in the past
200 years did not come with World War I, as
some historians argue, but with World War II, as
indicated by the consequences of that war and the
developments of the postwar period?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 17:00, bxbykay1

Thinking back to previous chapters, analyze america’s policies toward indians from the washington administration to the removal of indians from the southeastern states in the 1830s and early 1840s. what ideas and policies about indians remained the same? which changed? why?

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 17:00, kmontanab00

What does the author most likely say the time for negotiating with britain was over

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:00, samueldfhung

Which impact did the civil war have on the spread of disease in texas a. disease decreased bc people left the area to fight in the war b. disease increased bc medicine was in short supply. c. disease increased bc many new diseases were brought to the area d. disease decreased bc confederate doctors distribute new medicines to local communities

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:30, mikeylaaliz9960

Of those who attended the philadelphia convention, which of the following traits would be least likely to be found? a. many were highly educatedb. all were menc. many were from the urban centersd. many came from the western frontiers

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

. What argument could be made for the assertion
that the fundamental historical shift in the p...