What was the ruling of the Missouri court in the Dred Scott case?
A) Only Scott should be free.

B) The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.

C) The children of the Scotts would be free.

D) Only Scott's wife should be free.

B) The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.

Explanation:

In the Missouri court he was given freedom and his family but the owner of the farm's widow appealed the case and Scott appealed it to the Supreme Court where the Missouri court decision was overturned and African Americans couldn't become Americans citizens anymore and this is what led to the rise in popularity of the republican party and led to the election of Abraham Lincoln and the civil war.

depends on the age of the teen, many believe by the age of 16 a person should know the strong difference between right and wrong along with the difference between risky and immediate death. swimming with sharks might be dangerous but swimming with sharks while bloody meat is attached to you is just insane. even more if you have no idea what you're doing. however, no matter the age, as long as the person is skilled enough and has the mental and physical capacity to control their actions doing whatever sport they put their mind to is all that matters.

the answer to this question is the third option. hope this