Supporters of polling argue that it is a tool for democracy. Critics of polling think that it makes politicians reactors than leaders. In a paragraph, explain which opinion you agree with and why.

The concerns pointed to in post #3 are highly valid, in my opinion, yet I still feel that polling is a tool for democracy. Without devices like polls, would politicians have to rely on their own opinions and the opinions of their friends alone to surmise the general opinions of the populace?

Better to have some input, even potentially flawed input, than to be forced to rely on a very limited base of information.

Explanation:

i think iowa because you committed the crime there