Why did the 1946 gubernatorial election require intervention by the Georgia Supreme Court?

A.
African Americans sued the state over being prevented from participating in the state's primaries.

B.
Georgia's outgoing governor claimed widespread voter fraud had swayed the election.

C.
The race in Georgia was too close to call and a clear winner could not be determined.

D.
Georgia's constitution had conflicting rules about the line of succession for the office of governor.

answer:

b

i s t h e a n s w e r o f t h i s q u e s t i o n

Explanation:

35 is your answer because i looked it up

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.