Though unemployment during the great depression was widespread, it was higher in some parts of the united states than in others. a geographer uses unemployment data points to make a map, while an economic historian arranges data about state-by-state unemployment levels into a table. what information might the geographer be able to convey more clearly than the economic historian?
a. the relative sizes of the areas affected by each level of unemployment
b. the years when unemployment was worst in each area
c. the percentage of each state's population that was unemployed
d. the level of unemployment in each state

The correct answer is A. The relative sizes of the areas affected by each level of unemployment

Explanation:

A geographer different from an economic historian focuses on understanding social phenomena in relation to places and other geographical features, instead of focusing on the economy. This implies, in the case of studying unemployment during the Great Depression, the economic historian will focus only in economic aspects while the geographer would try to understand the phenomenon based on places and due to this, the geographer uses a map and might be able to study the areas affected by unemployment different to the historian that only a chart. Thus, the information the geographer might convey more clearly is "the relative sizes of the areas affected by each level of unemployment".

d and a is the correct anwsers

explanation:

troy donahue,   i think.