Read the following sentences from paragraph 2 of the speech:

martin luther king dedicated his life to love and to justice between fellow human beings. he died in the cause of that effort. in this difficult day, in this difficult time for the united states, it's perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are and what direction we want to move in.

how do the sentences use rhetoric to advance the speaker's point of view in the speech?

group of answer choices

kennedy uses emotional appeal to identify with the anger and sense of injustice from his audience.

kennedy uses an appeal to authority, imploring the audience to believe his words based on his status as a political leader.

kennedy uses a logical appeal to the audience as he provides statistics on how segregation tears communities apart. click to show rationale & item info

kennedy uses emotional appeal to identify with his audience on the grounds of compassion for each other.

Kennedy uses a logical appeal to the audience as he provides statistics on how segregation tears communities apart

Explanation:

Because he's using the fact he died because of what he believed in. No segregation. So people decided that they didn't like what he said. They are right he did dedicate his life to love and for Justice between human beings.

women should get jobs in the war industries

explanation:

during the time of the war women usually stayed back and got jobs to support the war by making bullets and machinery used in the war.

hope this

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: