The alien & sedition acts were considered by many, but because the courts weren't really well established, state lawmakers had to pass resolutions (resolves) saying they were not going to follow the law. question 3 options: illegal unconstitutional stupid racist

unconstitutional

Explanation:

The Alien & Sedition Acts were laws that took power in 1798. They meant that foreigners could be deported and that new immigrants coming to America would have a harder time getting the right to vote.

Additionally, the sedition part of the act prohibited public opposing of the government that would be seen as "false, scandalous and malicious". This act resulted in the imprisonment of more than 20 newspaper editors.

The laws were met with resistance. They went against the constitution that provided the freedom of speech and press. This is why there was a strong opposition to draw attention to how unconstitutional the law was and to finally pass the resolution against it.

big fat oof x

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]