In this speech writing assignment, you will research a problem, devise a solution, and persuade people to join your cause. your purpose is to persuade your class and community to change their actions and beliefs about the problem you’ve identified. you will choose one of the following topics to write about:

vending machines in the school cafeteria
required school uniforms
the use of technology in school, such as e-readers, phone apps, mp3 players.
free extracurricular school activities, such as running clubs, game clubs, etc.
after you have chosen your topic, choose a clear position either in support of or against your topic.

write a 500-word speech in support of your position on your chosen topic. make sure that you are using at least one of the persuasive techniques (logos, pathos, ethos). remember that your position should be based on facts, not opinions. if possible, deliver your speech to your classroom, teacher, or parents to practice the public speaking strategies outlined above.

the phenomenon that would be cited as evidence of increased economic interdependence between europe and the americas is  the development of mercantilism.

this theory suggests that the wealth of a country depends on its economic assets, or capital.

hope this : )

        i'm fairly sure that the correct answers are 2 and 3.

        i used both my knowledge of world history and the process of elimination to obtain these answers. option 1 cannot be a possible selection because the mandate of heaven belongs to ancient chinese philosophical belief. option 4 sounds like it would benefit the region than detriment it. however, both 2 and 3 explain a potential reason for what could have contributed to the fall of the roman empire.

      hope this ! if i were you, i'd get a second opinion, because i haven't taken this course for a year. best of luck!

***websites that me understand the curriculum better last year are and ***

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.