•how might a supreme court ruling to uphold the state law barring minors from using
social media affect young americans? how might such a ruling affect social media
companies? what might be some of the unintended consequences of such a ruling?

• considering what you have learned about the constitution, why is it very unlikely that
the supreme court would ever uphold a law barring young people from using social
media?


i will give u and be your friend if u need just me

answer:

answer:

1-it will affect the protection of their individual rights.

2- some particular, social media providers may argue that   government regulations impermissibly infringe on the providers’ own constitutional free speech rights.

3- it could have considerable implications for the regulation of free speech on such platforms.like constitutional injuries.

4- courts have held that the first amendment, which provides protection against state action, is not implicated by the   actions of these private companies.

explanation: some have expressed concern that these   sites are not doing enough to counter violent or false speech.

1-the reason most social media services use an age limit of 13 or over is in part because of a law in the usa. the coppa law children's online privacy protecction act. an entire generation of young americans has come of   age accustomed to looking to the supreme court to protect individual

rights,"

2-some have argued that congress should step in to regulate social media sites. government action regulating internet content

3-would constitute state action that may implicate the first amendment. under existing law,   social media platforms may be more likely to receive first amendment protection when they exercise more editorial   discretion in presenting user-generated content, rather than if they neutrally transmit all such content.

4- courts have concluded that many non-constitutional claims are barred by section   230 of the communications decency act.

explanation:

hope this

explanation:

i think it is in quadrant 4.

the five year plans were part of a command economy. there was little choice in what would be emphasized for the current 5 year period.

the answer to democracy or totalitarianism is a bit harder. in stalin's time, russia was totalitarian. now that's not entirely true. putin has moved towards at least the boundary.