Which of the following possible court cases could legitimately be argued under the terms of the quote above? 1. a person complains that the court ignored evidence relevant to the case which affected the outcome.2. a person says that the lawyer appointed by the court has too many cases to handle at one time.3. a person accuses a judge of extending court dates too long for eachside to gather evidence.4. a person refuses to provide a written statement related to the witnessing of a crime.

A person accuses a judge of extending court dates too long for each side to gather evidence case could legally be argued under the terms of the quote above.

Explanation:

Option C that is person blame a judge for put forth the court hearings or dates too long for each side to gather evidence case could legitimately be argued under the terms of the quote above as it is sometimes possible in some of the cases that court gives too long dates for hearing to find case related evidences. This court case can be lawfully argues from the petitioners or by the parties as this is an valid and legal accusation which can be true and can be considered as legitimate legal case

hello,

the steamboat is your answer.

it seems like its the only form of transportation on the choices.

the manhattan project's indispensable man