Was the boston tea party a civil disobedience

Yes.

Explanation:

The partakers were refusing to pay tea taxes. They were disobeying the law and caused a uprising.  They were unhappy.

"Civil disobedience can be defined as action taken by individuals to illustrate their dissatisfaction with certain laws or rules as a peaceful demonstration. It could be in the form of refusal to comply with certain policies or refusal to pay certain fines."  

the american colonists were happy with their vicorty, but the french were mad and the french and indians were not alies, and neither were the french and colonist. i think,

on the succession of solomon's son, rehoboam, around 930 bce, the biblical account reports that the country split into two kingdoms: the kingdom of israel (including the cities of shechem and samaria) in the north and the kingdom of judah (containing jerusalem) in the south.