Select all that apply. the fcc's original rule that equal time must be given does not apply to which of the following, and why?

a. radio; because there are fewer broadcasting licenses available than people who wish to broadcast. thus, it is necessary that the fcc step in to make sure that the viewpoints of people other than those who own licenses are represented in the media.
b. cable television; because by the time it was invented most of the fairness doctrine had been abolished, except for the political editorial rule and the personal attack rule.
c. it applies to media types (radio, television, and internet); to assure that no one viewpoint dominates.
d. the internet; because the internet is not regulated by anyone.
e. newspapers; because, in theory, anyone can start his own newspaper and express his point of view whereas the number of people who can participate in radio and television is limited by broadcast frequencies.

Newspapers; because, in theory, anyone can start his own newspaper and express his point of view whereas the number of people who can participate in radio and television is limited by broadcast frequencies.

Option E

Explanation:

The FCC rules do not apply to newspapers because in theory anyone can start a newspaper and express his point of view. Newspapers are not restricted to just one person or a specific number of broadcasters like radio and television.

Radio and television screening and viewing is limited by the number of broadcast frequencies. Newspaper industry does not limit the number of newspapers that can be printed and published. Also there is no limit on the number of people who can start a newspaper by writing their opinions.

i think its the outcome of people's preferences.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.