The policy called “apartheid” in south africa meant that

a. public places were segregated by race, and there was widespread discrimination against non-whites
b. all resources, such as diamonds and gold, were controlled by the government
c. all people were allowed to vote in elections
d. everyone had equal access to education and employment, regardless of race

select the best answer from the choices provided

a lot. if the people that will one day be our presidents, mayors, police and firemen are the same people that do stuff online , eating

we are screwed.

nope.

explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

he is a vloger now and he could't be vlogging everyday when he had to do the casting for minato.