World war 1
listed in the item bank are a number of key events from this field. some events have more details available when you click on them. drag and drop the events in chronological order by placing each in its corresponding open rectangle. if there is overlapping, simply trace the dashed line down to the timeline for clarification. itembank: move to bottombrown recognizes and names the cell nucleushooke coins the word cell after viewing cork cells with primitive microscopepasteur disproves spontaneous generation and proposes germ theoryschleiden & schwann propose cell theoryvirchow describes cell division; proposes that all cells arise from other cellsvan leeuwenhoek discovers bacteria with his improved microscope

the culture of the americas was influenced by the language, food, and music of africa.

explanation:

your welcome : )

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.