How do the authors develop the claim in the two passages?
passages from sugar changed the world.
begun talking about ending slavery, but then it
s in france and sent an army to try to defeat
vow napoleon's france followed in the
ne english
both passages the reader understand how the end of
involuntary servitude in haiti led to the end of involuntary
servitude in britain.
5,000-man army was led by his brother-in-law
red an amazing success: they captured
1802 and brought him to france, where he died
303. but the former slaves fought on. in two
ing, nearly 50,000 french soldiers died. and on
304, the victorious republic of haiti was born.
reedom, the former slaves defeated the armies
nd, then france: europe's two most powerful
both passages illustrate how property rights were more
important to the british than to americans.
both passages support the claim that human rights
became more important than property rights in the early
1800s.
both passages support the claim that the end of the slave
trade eventually led to the end of the sugar industry.
tn free; human rights won over property rights.
return
save and fxit
hoy

Both passages support the claim that human rights  became more important than property rights in the early  1800s.

Explanation:

The two given excerpts from "Sugar Changed The World" details how the cause of human rights began to come forth as more important to the world than the need to procure property. The two events of the two excerpts show how the slave trade began to deteriorate and led to the eventual freedom of the slaves.

The first excerpt talks about how "the former slaves defeated the armies of first England, then France" in the fight for their freedom. Their defeat of the two most powerful nations of Europe led to the decline of the slave trade, thus leading to the freedom of Haiti. The second excerpt then talks about the banning the "involvement of the English" in any slave trade in the House of Commons became a memorable day for the slaves. Even though no slaves were freed, it drastically put the fate of the slaves in a much better position, where there are no more slave trades plying. Questioning "whether a human, any human, could ever be property", the bill began to herald a new world for the slaves.

Thus, the correct answer for this is the third option.

a goverment for the people by the people

what are local authorities doing to fix the problem

explanation: