how did distance from rome likely affect people in the roman empire?

rome had less political control over people in distant provinces.
rome sent better goods and supplies to its far territories.
people further from rome had lower social status.
people closer to rome were more likely to hold political office.

Distance from Rome likely affect people in the Roman Empire as Rome had less political control over people in distant provinces.

Option A

Explanation:

The Roman Empire had a vast expanse and had in its possession all the areas neighbouring the Mediterranean Sea. According to the modern-day map of the world, the Roman Empire was spread in three different continents, that of Europe, Asia, and Africa.

An expanse this big made it difficult for the central administration functioning from Rome (the capital of the Roman Empire) to exercise control over areas as far as Caledonia and Hibernia in the northwest, and Aegyptus in the southeast of the empire.

the catholic church withhold people's access to the bible during the middle ages.

people could go to church and listen to the teachings, but it was absolutely forbidden to own and/or read the books of both the old and new testaments. it was also prohibited to translate the books (which where originally in biblical hebrew) to any other language.

this was done so the church could remain in control of what their teachings were and to enhance their importance and power, while also being able to judge people's actions through information that was unavailable for the general public.

i would say that the politicial parties from state to state varies.