Ill give branliest! plzzz

what is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent? ”

it cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.
the terms have no significant difference in meaning. juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.
“not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. however, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.
a jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

answer:

innocent means it's completely found out that the person had no relation to the case. not guilty means it's not proven the person is related to the case or not. that's just my understanding.

the transatlantic slave trade radically impaired africa's potential to develop economically and maintain its social and political stability. the arrival of europeans on the west african coast and their establishment of slave ports in various parts of the continent triggered a continuous process of exploitation of africa's human resources, labor, and commodities. this exploitative commerce influenced the african political and religious aristocracies, the warrior classes and the biracial elite, who made small gains from the slave trade, to participate in the oppression of their own people. the europeans, on the other hand, greatly benefited from the atlantic trade, since it allowed them to amass the raw materials that fed the industrial revolution to the detriment of african societies whose capacity to transform their modes of production into a viable entrepreneurial economy was severely halted.

it provided for selection of government employees through competitive examinations. it also made it unlawful to fire or demote covered employees for political reasons or to require them to give political service or payment, and it set up a civil service commission to enforce the law.

explanation: