subject
History, 08.11.2019 22:31 hallmansean04

What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent? ”
it cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.
the terms have no significant difference in meaning.
juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law. “not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. however, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.
a jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:50, kayeeii
Poem: the barn how does frankau try to strip the glamour from war? what might the date of the poem have to do with the feelings it expressed ?
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:00, iris7324
All native american time were united against their struggle with the european settlers true or false
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, hollybell1213
At the casablanca conference, allied leaders signed an agreement to share military technology decided to launch an invasion of southern france agreed to accept only the unconditional surrender of the axis powers agreed to form a scientific team to create the atomic bomb
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:20, via21
Which of the following best describes president harding's goals
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent? ”
it cannot be proved th...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 19.09.2019 08:30
Konu
English, 19.09.2019 08:30