History, 15.12.2019 20:31 luisdelacruzoct23

In mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?
a. banks cannot be created by congress.
b. states can determine which institutions within its borders must pay taxes.
c. a federal bank must pay taxes to the state in which it is located.
d. banks may only be created by congress, not by individuals

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

The correct option here is A.

The McCulloch v. Maryland case began when the state of Maryland wanted to impose taxes on the National Bank created by the Federal government, thus implying the state power over the federal government as they believed the Congress did not have the power to create a National Bank. The court upheld that under the Necessary and Proper clause, the Federal government did have the power to create the bank and this meant that the state law cannot impede the actions of the Federal government that are constitutional.

Answer from: alma79

In McCulloch c. Maryland, the State of Maryland argued that:

(A) Banks can not be created by Congress.

Further explanation

Since the creation of the United States, many states wanted to keep their independence and not be under the control of the new American Congress. It had been the reason for long debates between supporters of Virginia's plan and New Jersey plan supporters.

This rebellion of states against central power continued after the ratification of the constitution. In that case, Maryland did not want the US National Bank to compete with its local banks and required it to pay an annual fee to work in that state. The bank refused to pay this tax, and the state of Maryland complained that the bank was illegal.

The Maryland judges ruled in favor of the state assembly, but the US national bank appealed to the US Supreme Court, which confirmed its legality. Judge Marshall pointed out that the US Congress had more power than the states, and it had the right to create banking institutions. He explained if the authorization to create a national bank was not written in the constitution, it was because this subject was minor.

Learn moreRoe v. Wade: Plessy v. Ferguson: Furman v. Georgia: Answer details

Subject: History

Chapter: The 19th Century

Keywords: The US National Bank, Maryland, the constitution of the United States

Answer from: Quest

i think option 3. would be ur best bet and u need to write it urself

have a good day

Answer from: Quest

The answer is d. depriving colonists of trial by jury.

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 22:00, leleee10

Which of the following led to a continuation of the treatment in the excerpt above? a)the brutality of the trans-atlantic african slave trade. b)spanish repression after violent native uprisings in new spain during the 16th century. c)european competition to quickly establish colonial holdings in the new world. d)the reliance of the spanish on native americans to provide labor under the encomienda system.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 23:30, Mariann6362

Identify casue and effect in this unit you learned about several issues that were resolved by compromise during the constitutional convention. create a graphic organized like the one below and use it to show how the compromises affected framework of the new government (the graphic organizer is just 2 columns and one says compromises and one says effect and 3 boxes on each side)you so much!

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 00:30, sierram298

The american civil war most former enslaved african americans in texas began making a living as

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:30, anitaacan

True or false president andrew johnson granted pardons to thousands of southerners.

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

In mcculloch v. maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?
a. banks cannot be created by...