What could happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the state court, rather than in a federal court?

Concurrent jurisdiction allows more than one court to have the authority to hear the same case

Explanation:

Concurrent jurisdiction permits more than one court to have the power to listen to a similar case. This happens in typical cases, just as criminal cases. In numerous states, an individual can sue for a separation in the nearby locale level court, family court, or any of the area courts in the country. Remember, that each of the 50 states and the U.S. Domains reserves the option to choose their courts' locale so that it will differ state to state.

Since a decent variety locale gives both the state and the national government ward over the area, the groups and the topic of the case, at that point, both court frameworks can hear the case.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What would happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the State court, rather than in a federal court, is that the two different courts -State and Federal- have the faculty to hear the same case. It doesn't matter if it is a criminal case or a civil case. Litigants can decide the court they feel most comfortable to air their differences.

d

explanation:

john locke is most associated with the idea of consent of the governed which is the idea that the government is only valid if it has the consent of the people who are being governed.

hope this