Which best explains charles i’s actions after parliament refused him war funds

The sentence that best clarifies Charles I's activities after Parliament denied him war assets was that he broken up Parliament.

Explanation:

To stay away from this, Charles I's broken down Parliament and after it declined him war assets was that he disintegrated Parliament. The Parliament accused him of high treachery and different violations to England.

Relations between Charles I and Parliament step by step deteriorated. Until 1640, Charles controlled without a Parliament – this period is regularly alluded to as the 'Eleven Years Tyranny'.

War with Scotland constrained Charles to review Parliament. Rather than giving Charles cash, Parliament sent him the Grand Remonstrance (1641).

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

the answer wold be b) travel among nations should be regulated by an international organization