Pls hurry
from the letter, it can be inferred that mr. phillips admires frederick douglass, but doesn’t really know him

a) is pro-slavery

b) is anti-slavery

c) feels threatened by frederick douglass

The correct answer is "anti-slavery."

From the letter, it can be inferred that Mr. Phillips is anti-slavery.

We are talking about the letter written by Wendel Pillips, who was a man that supported abolitionism, civil rights and founded the American Anti-slavery Society. This is a letter addressed to Frederick Douglass. He expressed the importance of Douglass's work "Narrative," as a way of making people pay attention to the issue of slavery and creating consciousness of the big problem it represented in the United States.

hi did u tell us this and this is okay in the

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!