subject
History, 17.10.2019 21:00 salgado100400

The english bill of rights of 1689 states, "that levying money for or to the use of the crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal."

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 20:30, kruegeremma22
This excerpt reveals that elinor is select all that apply
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, hanchinsko12
What are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings? a. it established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role. b.it states that the english monarchy was a position that parliament delegated. c. it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament. d.it established that the people of england has the right to choose the monarch. e.it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, imorn20731
How did the governor's order that only georgian officers could command georgia's troops demonstrate a problem in the south
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:00, Jduxn
Which statement is the best summary of this passage?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The english bill of rights of 1689 states, "that levying money for or to the use of the crown by pre...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 21:02