For either mapp v. ohio or miranda v. arizona describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling protects those accused of a crime.

Which of the following scenarios would most likely occur if immigrants opened a restaurant featuring their native cuisine in a small town in america? (for example, chinese immigrants move to a small town in texas and open a chinese restaurant). a. they would get little interest, as americans generally do not like foreign cuisines. b. the dishes would remain essentially the same. c. the dishes would be changed to reflect the tastes of the new location. d. the dishes would be the same in a small town as they would in an enclave.