Do you think the united nations should establish a nonproliferation treaty for other types of weapons, such as chemical and biological? if so, what sanctions should be imposed on countries that refuse to sign it?

Although the Geneva protocol already exists in which the use of chemical or biological weapons for the states that signed it has been banned since 1925 and today there are about 137 countries that have accepted the same treaty, it is a bit of concern that the treaty focuses solely on its use and not on its manufacture and storage, which at the time of a war would be used since it is already available, I believe that it is very necessary that the United Nations elaborate a treaty where manufacturing is strictly prohibited , storage, sale and other activities with this type of weapons and those who infringe it could receive the following sanctions:

Explanation:

Avoiding the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is logical from the point of view of human preservation, currently the technology would allow the creation of devastating weapons that could kill entire countries and prevent these events from happening and protect the lives of innocent people should be the engine of rulers and international entities such as the United Nations.

the big stick policy was to still look powerful, and be nice at the same time. the big stick policy was also to countries who were at war, find peace with eachother.

the dollar diplomacy was to expand american business and get it to latin america, for that would be good for the economy.

you my friend, your regards.

agubaba khaleekha.