Sumer was a decentralized collection of city-states. what does this mean? question 8 options: a) each city-state had it's own god. b) there was a single capital city. c) there was no single ruler of the whole region. d) they only traded within the city.

C) There was no single ruler of the whole region

Explanation:

The Sumerian civilization was established in the valley of the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. This is the civilization that is considered to be the first one in the world, and the one that contributed to the rise of the other civilizations in the region. It was a civilization that was united under one ruler though, but instead it was designed in the manner of city-states. Each city-state had its own ruler and governing body which was functioning independently from the other city states, so Sumer was actually decentralized. The fact that each city-state had its own ruler was not an obstacle at all, as all of the Sumerian city-states were in good relations, constant contact, and they collaborated and supported each other. It might have even worked for the better that there was not a single ruler, as the power was never in the hands of only one person, thus a tyranny was avoided.

the correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option b. expanding civil services. diocletian and constantine paved the way for foreign invasion by dividing the empire, creating administrative bureaucracies and reorganizing the military, except for expanding civil services. hope this answer .

click to let others know, how is it

explanation:

explanation:

7 - to develop an asian ally

11- the red scare

14   the power of military -industrial complex

17 - the economy grew quickly

24 - the separation of church and state was not important