Is there any noticeable bias in the civil war?

Yes, there is a noticeable bias in the civil war. The South was biased against the North and the North was biased against the South.

Explanation:

Whenever historians write down history, some sort of biases always involves their writing. Historians when writing history have a bias that Lincoln ''freed the slaves'' even though that was not the case. And the South is usually painted as the evil side.

The Civil war caused damage to millions of people and their livelihood. It took decades to recreate what had been lost due to the war.

saint clair’s defeat, (november 4, 1791), one of the worst defeats ever suffered by u.s. forces in indian warfare, precipitated by british-indian confrontation with settlers and militia in the northwest territory following the american revolution. despite specific provisions in the treaty of 1783 for the evacuation of its forts on the northwestern border, britain had failed to yield these lucrative fur-trading posts. in hopes of reclaiming lost hunting grounds with british support, a northwest indian confederation was gradually molded between 1785 and 1787, consisting mainly of shawnee, delaware, ottawa, iroquois, ojibwa, miami, and potawatomi. kentucky frontiersmen reacted to this threat by initiating raiding parties on native villages as early as 1788, and indian warfare flared up the following year.

b) he seized power from the directory and appointed himself emperor

happy to

pls mark as brainliest