#22- what did the supreme court rule in the munn v. illinois case?
a) states can regulate railroads that operate interstate.
b) states can regulate grain storage fees in their states.
c) states cannot regulate large businesses at all.
d) states cannot regulate railroads that operate interstate.

The correct answer is B) States can regulate grain storage fees in their states.

What the Supreme Court did rule in the Munn v. Illinois case was that states could regulate grain storage fees in their states.

The Munn v. Illinois case was decided on March 1, 1877. The issue was that the state of Illinois settled grain warehouse by establishing the top rates. The Supreme Court decision favored Illinois 7-2. The court decided that the states may regulate the kind of use of private property in the case that regulation benefited people, knowing that the property is affecting the interest of the majority.

hawaii was the final state

the dust bowl, otherwise known as the dirty thirties, was a huge dust storm that killed multiple (and i mean  multiple) farmer's crops, leaving them homeless, and foodless, and jobless. in california, there were 5.7 million residents, and the population shrank as mexicans were repatriated. however, when the dustbowl happened, a lot of people began to move to california. by 1940, 250,000 people had arrived. therefore, your answer would be  the population increased, massively.  i hope this !

explanation: