What skills and experience enabled doña marina to act as an intermediary between the spanish and the aztecs? based on the evidence, what role did she play in interactions between the spanish and the aztecs?

La Malinche or Doña Marina or Malinalli or Malintzin was a Nahua woman (from the Mexican Gulf coast) who played a really important role in the Spanish conquest of the Aztec empire. La Malinche was an interpreter  advisor, confident and lover for the Spanish conquistador, Hernán Cortés. She was given as a present as a slave by the natives of Tabasco along other wowen (there were 20 women in total including her). She gave birth to Cortes's first son, Martin, who is considered one of the first mestizos (half-blooded) of Mexico.

Explanation: La Malinche or Doña Barbara played a crucial role in the conquest, giving valuable advice to Hernán Cortés and serving as a reliable interpreter to him. Her role is nowadays controversial because some people think that she incarnates the treason to native Mexicans.  

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

the answer is aggresion hope this and mark me as brainiest and add me as friend