Is it constitutional to ask all immigrants to carry proof of legal standing at all times?

In the USA, it's the job of the Supreme Court to answer questions of constitutionality.

To my knowledge, none of the Justices of the S.C. is a regular contributor to , so you'd need to bring your case through the normal channels.

If it were I writing the opinion on that question, I could write a simple, direct answer of probably less than 10 pages, that would boil down to "No. You've got to be kidding."

For one thing, how would you know that somebody walking down the street is an immigrant, unless they were also required to tattoo "FURRINER" on their forehead ?

I don't know if they were the most recent example, but certainly the most notorious example of an evil regime that required certain portions of the population to carry "papers" and provide them on demand was Hitler's reich of the 1930s and 40s.

don't know but i know the moderators know how to. : (

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: