subject
History, 07.07.2019 06:10 roxygreeneyes

Read this excerpt from extremely loud and incredibly close.
it took me nine hours to make, and i had thought about giving it to sonny, the homeless person who i sometimes see standing outside the alliance française, because he puts me in heavy boots, or maybe to lindy, the neat old woman who volunteers to give tours at the museum of natural history, so i could be something special to her, or even just to someone in a wheelchair. but instead i gave it to mom. she said it was the best gift she’d ever received.
which word from this excerpt most reveals the tone?
homeless, because the narrator uses the word “homeless” to describe someone he met
heavy, because the narrator’s list of ideas is bizarre and a bit outrageous
neat, because the narrator seems carefree and without worry
special, because it implies confidence

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:50, lolz55678
Which of the following was an effect of allied defeats and high casualty rates on the eastern front? the united states issued the fourteen points. russia entered the war on the allied side. the united states entered the war sooner. russia experienced a revolution and dropped out of the war.
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:30, nikejose11
When congress passed the way davis bill in response to lincolns reconstruction plans the president did what to the bill
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:40, dbuchlerdb5599
The zhou controlled the area to the east of the shang kingdom true or false pleas
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read this excerpt from extremely loud and incredibly close.
it took me nine hours to make, and...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 24.10.2020 21:20
Konu
Mathematics, 24.10.2020 21:20
Konu
SAT, 24.10.2020 21:30