What was the supreme court’s decision in barron v. baltimore in 1833?
a) the city of baltimore owed barron payment for damages
b) the bill of rights did not apply at the state level.
c) naturalized citizens were guaranteed equal rights.
d) the city of baltimore had violated the fourteenth amendment.
answer on edge is b) the bill of rights did not apply at the state level.

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option  B.

The Bill of Rights did not apply at the state level.

Explanation: The background of the Barron vs Baltimore case was a law suit filed by John Barron against the city of Baltimore. He claimed that Baltimore city had possessed his private property without any proper compensation. According to Bill of Rights he filed this law suit and the court ordered city to pay Barron. But an appellate court reversed the decision. Then Baron appealed to the Supreme court.

In 1833, Supreme court gave the decision in favor of the city. The cpourt asserted that the Bill of Rights is only effective with the federal government. Because the federal government is created according to the constitution and federal government is bound to follow the constitution rules like as bill of rights.But the states government is not bound to follow the Bill of Rights.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

an effect of the steamboat's popularity was that people began building canals in the united states and europe. this was done to find another way to transport goods across the country and in that time, transportation using the river was very slow and dangerous. it depended entirely on manpower and the current of the river. that all changed in the late 1700's when steamboats were introduced. they soon revolutionized travel and trade through the river and dominated the waterways. eventually, other means of transportation took over from the steamboats, but there was a time that they the united states to expand to the west.

the hollywood film industry of 1950 was threatened on several different fronts. television broadcasting was rapidly becoming the dominant entertainment medium in the united states. the paramount anti-trust consent decree requiring separate ownership for production companies and theater chains had gone into effect on 1 january 1950. large numbers of young men and women were marrying, having children, and moving to the suburbs, which affected the viability of downtown first-run movie theaters. foreign revenues were endangered by protectionist tactics including quota systems, high taxes, and blocked funds. finally, the morality and patriotism of hollywood films and filmmakers were under attack from government, religious, and citizens' groups.

explanation: