subject
History, 28.06.2019 17:30 ultimatesaiyan

Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the
vietnam war. he argues that the united states should have
never entered the conflict. he points out that vietnam did
not have any strategic value to the united states, nor did it
offer access to natural resources. he also notes that the
french had already been forced to abandon their colony in
vietnam because of fierce resistance from the vietnamese
people. finally, he explains that the u. s. military had never
before fought in jungles like the ones in vietnam.
which statement best summarizes the historian's claim?
o
a. the united states should never have participated in the vietnam
war
o
b. the u. s. military did not have experience fighting in jungles.
o
c. vietnam did not offer the united states access to natural
resources.
o
d. fierce resistance from the vietnamese forced france to abandon
vietnam.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, alcantar28eduin
Why was the moon important to kennedy and the nation
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, hii4199
The byzantine empire weakened after asia minor
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, viktoria1198zz
Which 19th century technological advancement would best allow farmers along the mississippi river in iowa to quickly transport their crops to buyers in louisiana?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, 19thomasar
Which choice describes some of the difficulties john adams faced as presiden
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the
vietnam war. he argues that the united st...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 22.11.2019 20:31