Which social effect may result from adding healthier options to a school lunch program?
angering school leaders who will have to pay more for the program
angering students because of the loss of familiar choices
the school board president's chances of being reelected
hurting the school board president's chances of being reelected

angering students because of the loss of familiar choices

Explanation:

From personal experiences, school lunch generally consists of unhealthy but fairly "good" food, or food that the culture usually appreciates. They also are generally more cheaper than fresh healthy food, and is the choice of the school board when distributing funds. People don't like change, and the adding of more expensive food as well as food that isn't appreciated by the targeted population would not be greeted well.

~

The correct answer is B) angering students because of the loss of familiar choices.

The social effect that may result from adding healthier options to a school lunch program could be angering students because of the loss of familiar choices.

However, students' health condition is a major issue in today's society. Students want to eat everything they can and know, but the problems come later with obesity and diseases. That is when regret comes. Schools have nutritional programs that invite the student to consider healthier options such as fruits, vegetables, juices, and less fat and no fast food. That is why is an important issue to be considered.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.