Which decision by the u. s. supreme court in the 2000 presidential election resulted in a widely disputed election?

to stop a vote recount in florida

to allow candidates the use of personal campaign funds

to change the number of electoral votes required to win

not to allow florida's electoral votes to count

U.S. Supreme Court decision to stop a vote recount in Florida in the 2000 presidential election resulted in a widely disputed election.

Explanation:

The US presidential election of 2000 was contested between the Democratic candidate Al Gore, at that time vice president, and the Republican candidate George W. Bush, for that then governor of Texas and son of former President George HW Bush (1989-1993). Bill Clinton, the outgoing president, vacated the position of president after having served a maximum of two periods allowed by the Twenty-Second Amendment. Bush won the hard-fought election on Tuesday, November 7, with 271 electoral votes against Gore's 266 votes (with one translucent vote abstained in the official recount). During the elections the controversy arose in who had won the 25 electoral votes of Florida (and, therefore, the Presidency), the process of recounting in that state that was stopped by the Supreme Court, and that the losing candidate had received 543,895 popular votes more than the winner.

“i think it is very plausible that if there are five votes to end the death penalty, it could be with the people who are on the court right now,” - smith

so basically it is not clearly and consistently imposed

it required the unanimous approval of the states before the congress could enact any measure.