Ahistorian is writing a book about british prime minister winston churchill. she claims that churchill was one of the earliest british leaders to realize that nazi germany was a serious threat to british security what is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid? o a. review primary sources to see if churchill ever recorded his opinions of nazi germany. o b. find out whether the historian has written any other books about british leaders. c. analyze secondary sources summarizing the effects of nazi germany on great britain. o d. cite the historian's book in another study about important 20th- century world leaders.

the answer is "focused on"

lol gave an answer 1 week that's the answer for those who need it in the future xd

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (: