subject
History, 22.06.2019 04:30 keagank

Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fill the throne, as reigning monarchs. shall they who are thought worthy of the highest station, in hereditary monarchies, be deemed unworthy of election to office, by the suffrages of a free people? if women, placed in the administration of great and vast national affairs, by the mere accident of birth, have acted wisely, much more might we expect not wisdom only, but integrity in the government of women, selected by free citizens, with a view to mental and moral fitness. short-answer questions where did henry amringe make these comments? what argument does amringe give to support his views?

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, demetriascott20
All state and federal officials are required to take an oath to support the constitution. select the best answer from the choices provided t f
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:30, tytiuna
What was true about the progressive movement?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:30, mamshie
Which statement about congress is accurate? it contains only the house of representatives. the senate’s membership is based on a state’s population. it is bicameral, according to the constitution. membership in both houses is based on equal representation.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 16:00, lucyamine0
Question (q): you say you would prefer moderate labor and lower wages; are you pretty comfortable upon your present wages? joshua drake (jd): i have no wages, but two days a week at present; but when i am working at some jobs we can make a little, and at others we do very poorly. q: when a child gets 3 s. [shillings] a week, does that go much towards its subsistence? jd: no, it will not keep it as it should do. q: do you receive any parish assistance? jd: no. q: why do you allow your children to go to work at those places where they are ill-treated or over-worked? jd: necessity compels a man that has children to let them work. q: then you would not allow your children to go to those factories under the present system, if it was not from necessity? jd: no. q: supposing there was a law passed to limit the hours of labor to eight hours a day, or something of that sort, of course you are aware that a manufacturer could not afford to pay them the same wages? jd: no, i do not suppose that they would, but at the same time i would rather have it, and i believe that it would bring me into employ; and if i lost 5d. [pennies] a day from my children's work, and i got half-a-crown myself, it would be better. q: how would it get you into employ? jd: by finding more employment at the machines, and work being more regularly spread abroad, and divided amongst the people at large. one man is now regularly turned off into the street, whilst another man is running day and night. q: you mean to say, that if the manufacturers were to limit the hours of labor, they would employ more people? jd: yes. how does joshua drake feel about a law that would limit working hours for children? how can you tell? list at least two pieces of evidence to support your answer. your answer should be in full sentences.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 02.10.2020 23:01
Konu
Advanced Placement (AP), 02.10.2020 23:01