Which statement describes a common trait of the three reconstruction amendments? they all prevented states from re-establishing a system of slavery. they have all been used to expand voting rights for minority groups. they all focused on extending citizenship and protecting civil rights of minority groups. they were all supported by both republicans and democrats at the time of their passage.

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.

They all focused on extending citizenship and protecting civil rights of minority groups

Explanation: The three Reconstruction Amendments are 13th, 14th and 15th amendments of thee constitution after the Civil war. This reconstruction amendment came after 60 years of the 12th amendment.These amendments are called as the reconstruction amendments because, they were proposed and enacted during the Reconstruction era.

However, the 13th amendment was proposed to abolish slavery and involuntary servitude, except for those duly convicted of a crime. This proposal ratified in Congress in 1865.

The 14th amendment was proposed to  address citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws for all persons and it was ratified in 1868 in Congress.

The 15th amendment was proposed to  prohibit discrimination in voting rights of citizens on the basis of "race, color, or previous condition of servitude."[4] All races, regardless of prior slavery, could vote in some states of the early United States, such as New Jersey, provided that they could meet other requirements, such as property ownership.

Therefore, the common link between these three amendments is to highlight on extending citizenship and protecting civil rights of all citizens along with minority group.

They all focused on extending citizenship and protecting civil rights of minority groups

Explanation:

this question makes no sense dude

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.