18. one way in which the supreme court decisions in mapp v. ohio (1961), gideon v. wainwright (1963), and miranda v. arizona (1966) are similar is that each resulted in (1) more legal searches without warrants (2) fewer gun control regulations (3) additional limitations on religious freedom (4) expanded rights for people accused of crimes

Explanation:

To Mirandize someone means that while you are arresting someone, you make them aware of their rights. Mirandize has become part of the English language. That's what Miranda v Arizona accomplished.

Mapp v. Ohio established that there is no breaking  the 4th amendment. Evidence that was not collected by due process can't be used in a court of law.

Gideon v. Wainwright makes it the state's responsibility to provide a lawyer for those unable to afford one.

All of these are intended to expand the rights of those accused of crimes.

monasticism. people often do monasticism in monasteries

most people such as me i dont have one but if   i did i would mostly likely quit my job if the economy was down cylcling that means less money if you go to a bigger job that is prospering you can earn more wage and still be able to feed yourself or why you work all people want more money then they have guarteed most people like me would switch jobs for a better one with higher wage