What is one-way oil causes problems in the middle east today?

question 10 options:

the presence of oil contributes to a growing difference between the wealthy and the poor.

many modern, western-style cities have been built in countries like iraq and saudi arabia.

middle eastern countries are constantly at war with western nations who want their oil.

the drilling and refining of oil has destroyed most of the middle east's environment.

Middle Eastern countries are constantly at war with Western nations who want their oil.

Explanation:

The discovery of oil reserves in Middle East has totally shaped its economy, politics and social organization in some aspects positively and in other negatively. Some countries that explore the oil had become very rich, while at the same time the extraction does affect negatively the environment, but the one-way oil causes problems in the Middle East today are related to conflicts and wars.

Most of the world’s resources of oil are in Middle East, since the discover of its reservoirs many conflicts and wars had occurred related to the oil extraction as the World War II and the Persian Gulf War. Western countries such as United States and United Kingdom depends on the supply of oil from this region, which made them get involved in the disputes for control of the reservoirs and issues related to trading of the oil, they justify their military presence and actions on Middle East territory as an act to defend their interest and demand for petroleum fuels.

based on this information, i would advocate against sweatshop labour because it exploits workers in unsafe working conditions with little pay. though sweatshops produce inexpensive goods, they harm the environment, workers, and often use unsafe materials to make consumer goods.

states

explanation:

as the old saying goes, all politics are local. state and federal governments affect our daily lives in numerous ways. yet, in our federal system, there is supposed to be a balance between federal and state power. as james madison envisioned it in federalist no. 51, “the power surrendered by the people” would be “divided between two distinct governments,” creating a balance of power that would enable the “different governments [to] control each other.”